Secure Academic Document Management: Brutal Truths, Real Risks, and the Future of Research Security
It’s easy to believe academic research files are locked down tight behind university firewalls, but reality bites harder than most campus IT teams care to admit. In 2023–2024, academic institutions around the globe became prime hunting grounds for cybercriminals, with universities bleeding sensitive data and reputations in equal measure. Secure academic document management isn’t just a compliance checklist; it’s a live-or-die necessity for anyone with research worth protecting. If you think your institution is safe because it hasn’t made headlines yet, think again—97% of UK universities reported cyber breaches last year, with ransomware payouts averaging a staggering $740,000. This isn’t just a technological arms race; it’s an existential threat to academic integrity, funding, and the very future of open research. In this deep-dive, we cut through the PR noise, exposing the brutal truths universities can’t ignore, and reveal what actually works when it comes to safeguarding research in an era of relentless digital risk. Whether you’re a doctoral student, IT lead, or executive worried about grants, here’s what every university needs to know now about secure academic document management.
Why secure academic document management matters more than ever
The hidden stakes: what’s really at risk
Universities have always been data-rich environments, but in recent years, the stakes have skyrocketed. It’s not just unpublished research findings on the line. Institutional reputations, intellectual property, student privacy, and even the viability of future funding all hinge on the effectiveness of secure academic document management. According to the UK Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2024, a near-universal 97% of universities suffered documented cyberattacks in the past year, with countless more incidents likely going unreported out of fear of reputational fallout.
Every breach exposes a web of risks: confidential student data, sensitive grant agreements, unpublished research, and faculty communications. For research-heavy institutions, a single leak could mean losing competitive advantage, forfeiting patents, or torpedoing years of collaborative effort. Regulatory penalties add another layer of pain, as new laws have equipped authorities with stronger enforcement tools and harsher fines. The conclusion is blunt: in the current landscape, secure academic document management isn’t a luxury—it’s the only way to avoid academic and financial ruin.
“Integrated, secure document management solutions tailored to higher education’s unique challenges are urgently needed.” — Andy MacIsaac, Information Security Buzz, 2024
Breach horror stories: when academia fails security
The academic world has seen its share of high-profile cybersecurity failures that read more like horror novels than IT reports. In 2023, Imperial College London suffered a breach that exposed sensitive research and student records, forcing an immediate shutdown of critical systems and triggering a months-long investigation. The University of Manchester similarly found itself scrambling after hackers accessed confidential documents, including personal data and internal communications. The aftershocks included not only operational paralysis but also intense media scrutiny, damaged trust, and the risk of legal action.
These aren’t isolated incidents. According to Collegis Education’s 2024 report, 79% of higher education institutions faced ransomware attacks last year, and a staggering 56% ended up paying the ransom. The average global payout? A hard-to-swallow $740,000 per incident (Coveware, Q2 2023). The collateral damage isn’t always measured in dollars—students and faculty can lose years of work, while universities risk plummeting in global rankings as their reputations are dragged through the mud.
- Imperial College London: Massive breach led to system shutdowns, public apologies, and major operational disruptions
- University of Manchester: Hackers accessed confidential documents, including personal and research data
- Multiple US institutions: Recent attacks exploited outdated document management platforms, exposing thousands of student SSNs
- Common thread: Institutions relying on personal email or outdated internal servers were most vulnerable (TechRadar, 2024)
- Long-term impact: Damaged reputation affects enrollment, research grants, and future funding
How compliance laws changed everything
In recent years, the regulatory landscape governing academic data has become a minefield. Legislation like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), and new country-specific mandates impose strict requirements for the handling, storage, and destruction of academic documents. Universities have been forced to overhaul legacy systems, migrate data, and retrain staff—all while under the threat of massive penalties for non-compliance.
| Law/Standard | Applies To | Key Requirements | Penalties for Breach |
|---|---|---|---|
| GDPR | EU/UK all personal data | Lawful processing, right to erasure, breach notification | Up to €20M or 4% annual turnover |
| FERPA | US student records | Access controls, consent for disclosure, audit trails | Loss of federal funding, lawsuits |
| HIPAA | US health research | Safeguards for health info, access restrictions | $100–$50,000 per violation |
| Local Data Laws | Varies by country | Data sovereignty, breach reporting | Fines, criminal liability |
Table 1: Major compliance frameworks impacting academic document management. Source: Information Security Buzz, 2024
The processes, policies, and technologies used to capture, store, access, and secure research papers, student records, and institutional data within higher education.
A US federal law protecting the privacy of student education records by restricting access, requiring consent for disclosures, and mandating robust audit trails.
The EU’s flagship privacy law, mandating strict data handling, breach notification, and user rights for any entity processing EU/UK personal data—including universities worldwide.
The anatomy of a secure academic document system
Core components every university needs
A truly secure academic document management system isn’t built from off-the-shelf parts and wishful thinking. It requires a deliberate, integrated architecture designed to address the unique needs—and attack surfaces—of higher education. At its core, such a system must combine robust technical controls with smart operational practices and a culture of security.
Key elements include encrypted storage, granular access controls, automated backup and disaster recovery, and comprehensive audit logging. Secure integration with collaboration platforms (like Teams or Google Workspace), document versioning, and compliance reporting are also non-negotiable. But technology alone isn’t enough: effective training, regular system audits, and a clear incident response plan form the last lines of defense.
- Encrypted storage: End-to-end encryption ensures document contents are unreadable even if breached
- Role-based access control: Only authorized users access sensitive files; permissions are regularly reviewed
- Audit trails: Every access or change is logged for forensic and compliance purposes
- Multi-factor authentication: Adds a critical layer to prevent unauthorized logins
- Regular backups: Protects against ransomware by enabling fast recovery of untainted documents
- Automated compliance reporting: Facilitates regulatory audits and internal reviews
Encryption, access control, and audit trails explained
Security buzzwords only matter if they’re backed by technical rigor.
The mathematical process of encoding documents so they can only be read with the correct decryption key. Academic records and research files should be encrypted both at rest and in transit.
Systematic restrictions on who can see, edit, or share which documents, based on roles (faculty, student, admin) and need-to-know principles.
Automatic logs recording every access, edit, or share of sensitive files, providing critical evidence for compliance and incident response.
| Security Feature | What It Does | Why It Matters in Academia |
|---|---|---|
| Encryption | Protects files from theft | Research is valuable IP; theft is rampant |
| Role-based access | Limits exposure to the right people | Prevents “too many cooks” from accessing |
| Audit logs | Tracks user behavior | Needed for legal compliance and forensics |
| Multi-factor auth | Stops most phishing attempts | Students/staff often lack security training |
Table 2: Key security features and their relevance to academic environments. Source: Original analysis based on Collegis Education, 2024, MDPI, 2024
Cloud vs. on-premise: the security debate
The debate between cloud-based and on-premise document management rages on, but the binary thinking is outdated. Cloud platforms can offer hardened, actively monitored environments with redundancy and faster patch cycles—if configured correctly. On-premise deployments promise direct physical control but often suffer from outdated hardware, patching delays, and resource constraints.
| Factor | Cloud-Based Systems | On-Premise Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Security Updates | Automatic, rapid | Often manual, delayed |
| Physical Control | Cloud provider | Direct university oversight |
| Scalability | Effortless | Resource-intensive |
| Compliance | Certified data centers, third-party audits | Must be managed internally |
| Resilience | Multi-region backups, built-in DR | Dependent on local infrastructure |
Table 3: Cloud vs. on-premise document management: strengths and weaknesses. Source: Original analysis based on TechRadar, 2024
Neither model is a silver bullet. The most secure academic environments blend best-in-class cloud services with tightly controlled local assets, always guided by thorough risk assessments and compliance mandates.
Common myths and epic failures in academic document management
Myth-busting: cloud is always risky (and other lies)
Cloud phobia is alive and well in higher education IT circles, but much of it is rooted in outdated assumptions. Modern cloud platforms—when properly configured—often surpass on-premise setups in terms of resilience, monitoring, and patch management. The real risk lies in misconfiguration and weak access controls, not the platform itself.
- Myth #1: “Cloud storage means losing control over your data.”
In reality, leading providers offer granular controls, encryption, and regular audits. - Myth #2: “On-premise is always safer.”
Data shows most breaches exploit outdated local systems, not hardened clouds. - Myth #3: “Compliance is easier on campus.”
Regulatory requirements are platform-neutral; what matters is documentation, controls, and training. - Myth #4: “Paper is the ultimate backup.”
Physical documents are not immune to theft, fire, or casual access.
Disasters that could have been avoided
Academic document management failures are rarely about technology—they’re about human error, underinvestment, and complacency. A US university lost years of grant proposals when an old server failed and backups hadn’t run in months. Another institution had hundreds of confidential student files accessed after a staff member sent a spreadsheet via unsecured email.
“The most catastrophic breaches aren’t always the work of shadowy hackers. Sometimes, it’s an undertrained staffer clicking ‘send’ to the wrong address that starts the avalanche.” — Security Analyst, MDPI, 2024
The real epic failures come from ignoring training, skipping audits, and treating document security as an afterthought. Institutions that keep their heads in the sand quickly find themselves in the headlines for all the wrong reasons.
Paper trails: nostalgia vs. security
There’s a seductive nostalgia about physical paper—marked-up theses, signed contracts, annotated lab notebooks. But the illusion of security is just that: an illusion. Paper documents are easy to misfile, lose, or steal; they offer no version control and zero auditability.
The legacy approach of storing academic records in physical form, often seen as “safe” but vulnerable to loss, fire, and unauthorized viewing.
The ability to trace every action, access, or modification of a document—a security and compliance essential that paper simply can’t match.
In a world where compliance and speed are non-negotiable, digital, well-audited systems make paper trails look like relics of a less accountable era.
Case studies: the good, the bad, and the reckless
When security saved the day: real-world turnarounds
Not every security story ends in disaster. At University College London, a series of targeted phishing attacks in 2023 exposed staff credentials. But thanks to robust auditing, real-time monitoring, and rapid response teams, attackers were contained before any sensitive research was leaked. Similarly, a mid-sized European institution credits its adoption of role-based document access for preventing a ransomware attack from spreading campus-wide; only a handful of non-critical files were affected.
These success stories share common threads: regular vulnerability scans, enforced multi-factor authentication, and well-drilled incident response plans. While no academic environment is breach-proof, those with layered defenses and decisive action plans consistently limit damage and learn fast.
Academic reputation destroyed overnight
Contrast that with the nightmare experienced by a major research university in the US Midwest. In late 2023, attackers exploited a forgotten file server containing sensitive pre-publication manuscripts and patent documents. News of the breach spread like wildfire, and within days, collaborative partners withdrew, grant sponsors demanded audits, and the institution’s ranking plummeted.
“We lost more than data. We lost trust—internally and externally. Recovery wasn’t just about restoring systems, but rebuilding our entire reputation.” — University IT Director, Collegis Education, 2024
Months later, ongoing investigations and legal headaches continue to cast a shadow over the university’s research output and recruitment.
Cross-industry lessons: what academia can steal from banks
While universities wrestle with legacy systems and shoestring budgets, industries like banking have set the gold standard for document security—out of sheer necessity. Academic institutions can take a page from their playbook by adopting layered security, continuous monitoring, and zero-trust principles.
| Security Practice | Banking Sector Implementation | Academic Adaptation |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous monitoring | 24/7 SOCs reviewing all activity | AI-based alerts for document access |
| Segregation of duties | No single person controls everything | Divide admin, faculty, student permissions |
| Penetration testing | Quarterly, with third-party auditors | Annual “red team” campus exercises |
| Mandatory training | Ongoing, role-specific modules | Faculty/staff cybersecurity bootcamps |
Table 4: Security best practices from banking, adapted for academia. Source: Original analysis based on Collegis Education, 2024
Banks’ relentless paranoia—constant review, no single point of failure, and radical transparency—can help universities break out of the “it won’t happen here” mindset.
Step-by-step: building your secure academic document workflow
Audit your vulnerabilities: a brutal checklist
Before you can secure what you have, you need to know where you’re bleeding data. Most universities don’t fail for lack of software—they fail because they skip the hard, sometimes embarrassing work of self-examination. Here’s a checklist that pulls no punches:
- Inventory all document systems: Where do research, student, and administrative files actually live?
- Map access rights: Who can see or edit sensitive files? Are old accounts still active?
- Check for shadow IT: Are staff or students using personal email or unauthorized cloud storage?
- Test backup frequency: Can you recover last week’s files? Last month’s?
- Review incident logs: What’s the response time and follow-up for past breaches?
- Simulate a breach: How quickly could you identify, contain, and report an incident?
Setting up policies and permissions
Policies aren’t just paperwork. They’re the backbone of secure academic document management, defining who gets access, under what circumstances, and what the consequences are for violations.
- Data classification policies: Define what’s sensitive, public, or restricted, and apply controls accordingly
- Least privilege principle: Only grant access necessary for each role; regularly review permissions
- Incident response playbooks: Set clear steps for breach detection, notification, and remediation
- Regular policy updates: Adapt to new regulations, threats, and technologies
Without detailed, enforced policies, even the best technology quickly unravels into chaos. Policy-driven security ensures that even as teams change, the rules stay clear and enforceable.
In the long run, strong document management policies are less about bureaucracy and more about protecting what’s irreplaceable—intellectual capital, student trust, and institutional legacy.
Training faculty and staff: the human firewall
No document management system can compensate for a poorly trained workforce. Most breaches originate from human error—phishing clicks, weak passwords, or mishandled files. Regular, engaging training transforms your biggest vulnerability into your strongest defense.
- Mandatory onboarding: Security training is non-negotiable for all new hires and students
- Phishing simulations: Test users with realistic attack scenarios; reward good responses
- Annual refreshers: Document management threats evolve—so should your training
- Real-world examples: Use past incidents to make lessons stick
“Faculty and staff aren’t just users—they’re the human perimeter. Training is what stands between your research and the next ransomware payout.” — Security Consultant, TechRadar, 2024
Beyond compliance: future-proofing your academic documents
AI, blockchain, and quantum-resistant security
Universities are on the front lines of technological innovation—and so are attackers. While buzzwords like AI, blockchain, and quantum-resistant encryption get thrown around, what really matters is the practical, verified impact of these technologies on document protection.
| Technology | Application in Document Security | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI anomaly detection | Flagging suspicious file activity | Learns new threats rapidly | Needs quality data |
| Blockchain | Immutable file timestamping/sharing | Unalterable audit trails | Complex, resource intensive |
| Quantum-resistant | Encryption immune to quantum attacks | Futureproofs critical research | Early days, slow adoption |
Table 5: Next-generation technologies and their real-world impact on academic document management. Source: Original analysis based on MDPI Study, 2024
Incorporating these emerging tools requires more than budget—it demands expertise, rigorous testing, and a willingness to adapt as threats evolve.
The real win isn’t chasing buzzwords—it’s building layered defenses that remain resilient, even as the threat landscape shifts.
Digital archiving and the problem of longevity
Academic documents don’t just need to survive the next breach—they need to last for decades, accessible to future researchers. Digital archiving poses unique challenges: file format obsolescence, storage media decay, and metadata loss.
- Frequent media migration: Move archives to new storage platforms as hardware ages
- Standardized file formats: Use open, widely supported formats (e.g., PDF/A, XML) to ensure long-term access
- Robust metadata practices: Detailed, consistent tags enable future search and compliance auditing
- Redundant, geo-dispersed backups: Protect archives from local disasters or hardware failures
- Regular integrity checks: Automated processes validate the readability and completeness of stored files
Ignoring digital preservation isn’t just lazy—it’s reckless. The cost of losing decades of research dwarfs the investment in durable archiving strategies.
Open access vs. locked down: finding the balance
The tension between open academic exchange and airtight security is as old as the internet. While open access fuels collaboration and innovation, hyper-restrictive controls can strangle research progress.
Balanced academic document management means:
- Role-based sharing: Open access for public research, strict controls for pre-publication and sensitive data
- Automated embargoes: Time-limited restrictions that lift after publication or contract expiration
- Transparent policy communication: Clear guidelines on what’s open, when, and to whom
- Researcher autonomy: Faculty-driven decisions, with institutional oversight, on document openness
The best systems empower academic collaboration without sacrificing security or compliance.
Red flags and hidden benefits: what nobody tells you
The cost of inaction: from lost grants to lawsuits
Failing at document management isn’t just embarrassing; it’s financially catastrophic. Universities that treat security as an afterthought pay a steep price.
| Consequence | Real-World Example | Cost (USD/GBP) |
|---|---|---|
| Lost grants | Data breach leads to grant withdrawal | Up to $2 million |
| Lawsuits | Students sue over leaked records | $100,000–$500,000+ |
| Regulatory fines | GDPR violation after document loss | €20 million or 4% revenue |
| Reputation damage | Drop in student applications | Unmeasurable (years lost) |
Table 6: The real cost of ignoring document security. Source: Original analysis based on Collegis Education, 2024
“Your institution’s legacy is only as safe as its weakest document system. Ignore it, and you’re gambling with your future.” — Information Security Buzz, 2024
Unconventional benefits of getting security right
Tight document controls don’t just avoid disaster—they bring hidden upsides that boost academic output and institutional health.
- Accelerated research collaboration: Secure sharing tools enable faster, more confident teamwork across borders
- Streamlined grant applications: Automated compliance reporting speeds up funding approvals
- Greater student trust: Transparent privacy policies attract top talent and reduce churn
- Institutional resilience: Frequent drills and backups mean fewer interruptions and faster recovery after incidents
Spotting snake oil: vendor promises vs. reality
The academic tech marketplace is rife with vendors hawking security “solutions” that overpromise and underdeliver. Here’s how to separate the genuine from the gimmick.
- Demand third-party audits: Only consider platforms that submit to regular, independent security reviews
- Insist on compliance certifications: GDPR, FERPA, ISO 27001—no certificates, no deal
- Ask for clear uptime SLAs: Guarantees mean more than vague promises of “reliability”
- Test incident response: Run a simulated breach and judge the vendor’s reaction in real time
- Check integration capabilities: The best tools work with your existing systems, not against them
Don’t be seduced by flashy dashboards or AI buzzwords. Insist on real evidence, verifiable controls, and peer references.
In the end, the only thing worse than no security is a false sense of it.
Expert insights: advice from the front lines
What IT and compliance officers wish you knew
Ask any university IT or compliance officer and you’ll get the same answer: most academic breaches are preventable with discipline, not dollars.
“It’s not about the fanciest tech. It’s about marrying policy, training, and relentless review. Don’t wait for a breach to get serious.” — University CIO, TechRadar, 2024
- Start with inventory audits: Know what you have before you try to secure it
- Educate relentlessly: Cybersecurity is everyone’s job, not just IT’s
- Automate compliance checks: Eliminate manual errors wherever possible
- Practice incident response: Drill your breach response until it’s second nature
- Invest in continuous improvement: Security is a process, not a project
Real stories from faculty and researchers
Faculty and researchers live with the daily realities of document management—both its frustrations and its potential.
Many recount near-misses: a misplaced grant proposal found on a forgotten USB stick, or a research draft accidentally emailed to a competitor. Others share relief at the university’s rapid lockdown after a phishing attack, crediting clear policies and real-world training.
Still, the message is clear: when document management works, it fades into the background—letting scholars focus on research, not risk.
Why your next audit will be different
Today’s security audits don’t just check boxes—they dig into the messy realities of campus workflows.
A comprehensive review of document storage, access, and backup systems, often involving simulated attacks and forensic analysis.
The unsanctioned use of personal devices, consumer cloud services, or non-approved apps for academic work—a key audit red flag.
Unlike the past, modern audits are more adversarial, more technical, and less forgiving. Being audit-ready means living compliance every day, not just the week before review.
The future of academic research security: trends to watch
Emerging threats: from ransomware to insider sabotage
The threat landscape for academic documents is expanding fast. Yes, ransomware is the headline risk, but new dangers lurk beneath the surface.
- Insider threats: Disgruntled staff or students with privileged access
- Supply chain exploits: Vulnerabilities in third-party research tools or cloud platforms
- Social engineering: Customized phishing attacks targeting specific faculty
- Credential stuffing: Attackers using leaked passwords from other breaches
- Zero-day exploits: Attacks that bypass even the latest security patches
Collaboration tools: friend or foe?
Collaboration platforms like Teams, Slack, and Google Drive have become indispensable in modern research, but they’re also frequent vectors for accidental leaks or targeted attacks.
| Collaboration Tool | Security Strengths | Weaknesses/Concerns |
|---|---|---|
| Teams/Slack | Encrypted chat, role-based | Risky file sharing, lax channel controls |
| Google Drive | File auditing, MFA support | Easy to overshare “anyone with link” |
| Email Attachments | Ubiquitous, simple | No audit trail, easily forwarded |
| Secure Portals | Restricted, logged access | Friction for casual sharing |
Table 7: Collaboration tools—balancing ease of use and document security. Source: Original analysis based on MDPI Study, 2024
To harness these tools safely, universities must enforce granular permissions, regular audits, and user training.
The best platforms integrate secure document management with seamless collaboration—without sacrificing control.
How your.phd is changing the research landscape
Amid the chaos, tools like your.phd are reshaping how academics approach complex document management. By automating analysis, summarization, and compliance checks, they free researchers to focus on high-level work instead of administrative drudgery.
Such platforms use advanced AI to interpret complex datasets, classify sensitive information, and even spot emerging risks. The result? Faster literature reviews, more accurate data interpretation, and a tangible reduction in human error.
- Instant analysis of research papers and datasets
- Automated compliance checks for FERPA, GDPR, and more
- Effortless citation generation and bibliography management
- Time savings that let researchers focus on discovery, not paperwork
While no tool replaces vigilance and policy, platforms like your.phd provide the scalable backbone needed for 21st-century research security.
Adjacent challenges: what else you need to secure
Protecting research data vs. document management
Document management and research data protection are closely linked but distinct challenges. Documents like proposals, reports, and correspondence contain summaries and context—but raw research data, lab results, and experiment logs carry their own risks and requirements.
Specialized controls over datasets, code, and experimental logs—often larger, more sensitive, and subject to stricter sharing rules than general documents.
The broader process of storing and securing academic records, correspondence, and non-data files.
A secure environment must address both, applying tailored controls and storage solutions to each.
Ultimately, robust research security is about holistic protection—locking down every format, every file, and every access point.
Managing access for remote and hybrid teams
The pandemic-driven rise of remote and hybrid work has shattered old assumptions about campus security perimeters. Today, faculty and students routinely access sensitive documents from home networks, shared devices, and mobile platforms.
- Zero-trust access: Never trust any connection by default; always verify, always require MFA
- VPN tunneling: Encrypted channels for offsite document access
- Device registration: Only certified devices gain access to sensitive platforms
- Session timeouts: Automatic logout after periods of inactivity
- Geo-fencing: Restrict access by location when possible
Student records: privacy, access, and risk
Student records remain one of academia’s most attractive—and vulnerable—data targets. Regulations like FERPA mandate strict access controls, while students demand transparency and easy access.
| Challenge | Secure Solution | Risk if Ignored |
|---|---|---|
| Unauthorized access | Role-based permissions | Identity theft, lawsuits |
| File tampering | Immutable audit trails | Grade fraud, trust loss |
| Loss of records | Automated backups | Legal penalties, lost opportunities |
Table 8: Securing student records—risks and solutions. Source: Original analysis based on Collegis Education, 2024
Balancing privacy and access is a constant struggle, but robust document management systems and clear student communication are non-negotiable.
Conclusion: the new rules of academic document security
Synthesis: what you must do now
Academic document security is no longer optional—it’s the new baseline for survival and excellence in research. Universities, research centers, and individual scholars must take decisive action.
- Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments
- Enforce strong, role-based access controls across all document systems
- Automate backups, compliance reporting, and incident response
- Invest in continuous faculty and staff training
- Embrace next-generation technologies judiciously
The institutions that thrive will be those who treat document security as an evolving practice—not a one-time project.
By embedding secure academic document management into their DNA, universities not only avoid disaster but position themselves as trusted, resilient leaders in global research.
Looking ahead: what will define secure academic document management in 2030?
Secure academic document management will always be a moving target, shaped by new threats, regulations, and research needs. But the core principles—discipline, transparency, and adaptability—will remain constant.
Institutions that foster a culture of vigilance, empower staff and researchers, and invest in proven, flexible tools will keep their data—and their reputations—intact. The future belongs to the prepared, not the paranoid.
Brutal truth? In academia, security isn’t the enemy of openness—it’s the foundation of lasting impact. Whether you’re chasing the next Nobel or just protecting tomorrow’s student records, secure academic document management is your first, last, and best line of defense.
Transform Your Research Today
Start achieving PhD-level insights instantly with AI assistance